home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- > Okay my brain is starting to bleed because I can't make up
- > my mind on a consistent interface for MARP so I thought I would
- > ask what you blokes thought would be best....
- >
- >
- > 1. Do you like how with Amos you have to 'Set' which object
- > you want the operations to be applied to ?
- >
- > Example:
- >
- > Screen 1 : Circle 10,10,10 : Screen 0
- >
- > 2. Or would rather wnat to specify the object along with
- > the operation ?
- >
- > Example:
- >
- > Circle 1,10,10,10
- >
- > I realise that their are advantages and disadvantages to
- > both and this is what is causing my brain problems!
- >
- > Because i want MARP to be consistent it has to be either 1
- > or 2...
- >
-
- I guess it depends on what you're making MARP for. If it is
- intended to be a pure AMOS replacement (with maybe an Amos2C
- translator thrown in), I guess you would have to stick to the way
- Amos does it (which I believe is method 1 for screens and 2 for
- icons). However, if it is the ease of use of Amos you're after, you
- might as well go for the most consistent choice (might be the same
- one, I don't know). Maybe you could find out if there's any
- (design) filosofy behind the way Francois did it.
-
- Branko Collin
- bcollin@mpi.nl
-
-
-
-